Legal Opinion

Maney v. Boise Title & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1926No. 16145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county, Okla., by defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover on a certain deficiency judgment alleged to have been rendered against the plaintiff in error in the district cou.rt of the Seventh judicial •district of the state of Idaho, sitting in and for Washington county in said state. A copy of the judgment of foreclosure in !he Idaho case is attached to the petición of defendant in error, but there is no copy of the deficiency judgment attached thereto.

The issues being joined, the causa came…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Barnes v. Buffalo Pitts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Appling v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Inhabitants of the First Parish in Brunswick v. McKeanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1827

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shearn v. FentonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Maney v. Boise Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Great American Indemnity Co. v. BisbeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. RaedekerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API