Legal Opinion
King v. Fenton
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1930No. 27257PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an action in habeas corpus instituted by plaintiff against defendant as warden of the state penitentiary. Upon trial in the district court for Lancaster county, plaintiff was discharged from custody, and defendant has appealed.
We have carefully examined the record and find it to he free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore
Affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Mercer v. FentonNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- Brott v. FentonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931