In re the Marriage of Barleen

Mother appeals the trial court’s order of January, 1992, refusing to set aside a July, 1991, modification of the custody provisions of a March, 1991, dissolution judgment.1 We affirm.

The parties have not properly identified their documents, leaving to us the task of determining what transpired below and what is actually before us. That which mother has labelled a “motion to show cause” why the July judgment should not be vacated is, in effect, a motion under ORCP 71B(l)(c) to set aside the judgment for misconduct of an adverse party.2 We treat the trial court’s order “affirming” the July…