Legal Opinion
KLOCK v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 18, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00498Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION VINCENT KLOCK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:21-cv-00498-JPH-DLP ) INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, ) GWENDOLYN M. HORTH Chairman, ) CRAIG SMITH Parole Officer, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER I. Granting in forma pauperis status Mr. Klock's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. [2], is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). While in forma pauperis status allows Mr. Klock to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, he remains liable for the full fees. Ross v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago,
748 F. App'x 64, 65 (7th Cir. 2019)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Miguel Perez v. James FenoglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Cesal v. MoatsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Colbert v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.