Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 2007Published

1Dissent

Pigott, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. In my view, Travelers should not be precluded from asserting the affirmative defense that plaintiff Hospital lacked standing to sue—i.e., that it did not obtain a valid assignment from the recipient of medical services—even though Travelers did not obtain additional verification or deny the claim within the prescribed time periods set forth in the no-fault insurance regulations.*

As explained by the majority, Travelers failed to request ad*321ditional verification after receiving the Hospital’s claim and assignment of benefits forms, nor did it deny…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. WalkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Central General Hospital v. Chubb Group of Insurance CompaniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Worcester Insurance v. BettenhauserNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API