Commonwealth v. Molino
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentBeck, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that the forced extraction of blood from appellee was a clear violation of the provisions of Pennsylvania’s Implied Consent Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1547 (1984) (ICL). However, unlike the majority, I find that the police conduct was undertaken in bad faith and intentionally violated the ICL. Where the police undertake conduct in bad faith and deliberately disregard an individual’s exercise of a statutory right, I conclude the law supports the suppression of the illegally obtained evidence. I would therefore affirm the suppression court’s order…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.