Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Molino

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1991No. 352Published

1DissentBeck, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that the forced extraction of blood from appellee was a clear violation of the provisions of Pennsylvania’s Implied Consent Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1547 (1984) (ICL). However, unlike the majority, I find that the police conduct was undertaken in bad faith and intentionally violated the ICL. Where the police undertake conduct in bad faith and deliberately disregard an individual’s exercise of a statutory right, I conclude the law supports the suppression of the illegally obtained evidence. I would therefore affirm the suppression court’s order…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API