Legal Opinion

In re Eric F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record reveals that Family Court properly considered all reasonable dispositional alternatives (see, Family Ct Act § 754) and that respondent’s placement was "the least restrictive custodial disposition consistent with the child’s requirements for treatment and/or supervision” (Matter of Sandra XX., 169 AD2d 992, 993-994; see also, Matter of Peter VV., 169 AD2d 995, 996). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Townsend, J. — Person In Need of Supervision.) Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Sandra XX.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. In re the Peter VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Timothy T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re Justin A. J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992