Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Santosuosso

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 31, 1986PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

A motion judge in a jury of six session rejected an affidavit in support of a motion to suppress and denied the motion “for failure to comply with [Mass.R.Crim.P.] 13(a) (2).” We think that, in the circumstances of this case, the affidavit of counsel which was presented to the judge in support of the motion served the purpose of the rule. Accordingly, we remand the matter to be decided on the merits.

1. In order to put the facts of this appeal in proper perspective, we begin by discussing the prior proceedings in the nonjury session of the District Court, where the defendant was convicted on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HofferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. GauldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. SmallwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. LoughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. TrigonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MubdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. GallagherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API