State v. Terry
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking his probation, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to exclude hearsay evidence offered through his probation officer on the ground that the admission of that evidence violated his due process right to confront witnesses. State v. Johnson, 221 Or App 394, 190 P3d 455, rev den, 345 Or 418 (2008). We agree with defendant, and reverse and remand.
The pertinent facts are few. The state filed a motion to revoke defendant’s probation on the ground that defendant had violated a “no contact” order. At the hearing on the motion, defendant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. ComitoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Martel WALKER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. MonkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. VAANACourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. VaanaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011