Boyd v. Johnson

As shown in the original opinion, appellee by cross-action in the form of an action in trespass to try title, sought recovery of title to the land in controversy. Appellant pleaded not guilty.

[1] Appellee, in support of its action, introduced the deed to it from the substitute trustee. It also introduced the written appointment of the trustee. Appellant objected to the introduction of both instruments, but has assigned no errors upon the action of the court in overruling those objections, and therefore this action of the court cannot be considered or reviewed here. Accordingly, both…