Burkhalter v. Jones
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Doniphan District Cowrt. Action brought by Charles Burhhalter against Jane Jones, for the purpose of having an alleged contract corrected and reformed and specifically enforced. The case was submitted to the court, without a jury, and the court made the following findings, to wit: CONCLUSIONS OP PACT.
Read the full summary
Error from Doniphan District Cowrt. Action brought by Charles Burhhalter against Jane Jones, for the purpose of having an alleged contract corrected and reformed and specifically enforced. The case was submitted to the court, without a jury, and the court made the following findings, to wit: CONCLUSIONS OP PACT. “1. On August 2, 1883, N. N. Jones (the husband of the defendant,) died, at Normal, Illinois, seized and possessed of E. J of N. E. J of N. E. jjf and S. E. | of N. E. J, sec. 19, township 3, range 21, in this county, being 60 acres, which land had been conveyed to him more than ten…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by Charles Burkhalter against Jane Jones, in the district court of Doniphan county, for the purpose of having an alleged contract corrected, reformed, and specifically enforced. The case was submitted to the. court without a jury, and the court made special findings of fact and law, and upon such findings rendered judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, dismissing the plaintiff’s action without prejudice. Of this judgment the plaintiff now complains.
The plaintiff resided at Troy, Kansas,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Werner v. RawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Chute v. QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Bird v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Young v. SchwintSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Bentz v. EubanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.