Busse & Borgmann Co. v. Upchurch
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
This is an action upon a claim presented to an administratrix and rejected by her.
The action was instituted in the Municipal Court of Cincinnau. A jury was demanded. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant filed a motion for a new' trial, and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court overruled the defendant’s motion for a new trial and sustained her motion for judgment, on the ground that the defendant’s claim against the. estate was barred by the statute of limitations.
On appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bricker v. Buhl Optical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Harris v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Estate of FahleOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- Trinka Services, Inc. v. STATE BD., ETC., OF NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Grossi v. Presbyterian University HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fitzpatrick v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1956
- Hampton v. Norristown Board of Adjustment, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.