Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Marriage of Young

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 18, 1980No. 3617-IIPublished

1DissentPetrich, J.

(dissenting)—I respectfully dissent from the conclusion of the majority. In Decker v. Decker, 52 Wn.2d 456, 326 P.2d 332 (1958), the Supreme Court abolished the strict distinction between support awards and property settlements in dissolution actions for purposes of enforcing the provisions of the dissolution decree by contempt proceedings. In so doing, the Supreme Court recognized the strong public interest of the State in dissolution proceedings and its need to protect the interests of the public in such matters as well as to protect the welfare of the parties. Decker v. Decker, supra at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Decker v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Kinne v. KinneWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Boudwin v. BoudwinWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. In Re the Marriage of RinkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API