Legal Opinion
The Office of Consumer Advocate v. The Public Service Commission of Wyoming
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 2013No. S-12-0119, S-12-0120, S-12-0121, S-12-0122PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Chief Justice.
[11] The manager of the Wyoming Universal Service Fund (WUSF) filed confidential reports with the Wyoming Public Service Commission (PSC) containing his recommendations for the WUSF assessment level for fiscal years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. Upon notice from the PSC that public hearings would be held to consider the manager's reports, Qwest asked for contested case hearings. Qwest also asserted it did not have sufficient information to allow it to de termine whether the manager's reports were correct.
[12] The PSC denied Qwest's requests for contested case hearings,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barlow Ranch, Limited Partnership v. Greencore Pipeline Company LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Sublette County Board of County Commissioners v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Carlson v. BrattonWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Michael's Construction, Inc. v. American National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Northfork Citizens for Responsible Development v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Union Telephone Company v. The Wyoming Public Service Commission and It's Wyoming Universal Support Fund Manager and All West Communication, Inc. Dubois Telephone Exchange, Inc. Range Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Rt Communications, Inc. Silver Star Telephone Tri County Telephone, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- The Office of Consumer Advocate v. The Public Service Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013