Legal Opinion
Wise v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 10, 2013No. A13A2334PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Presiding Judge.
A jury found Mark Daniel Wise guilty of three counts of burglary, and the trial court denied his motion for new trial.1 On appeal, Wise contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. Upon our review, we affirm.
Following a criminal conviction, the defendant is no longer presumed innocent, and we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. Sidner v. State, 304 Ga. App. 373, 374 (696 SE2d 398) (2010). “We neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses, but determine only whether, after viewing the evidence in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Parnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Merritt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Sidner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- HARVEY v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Platt v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- St. Louis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Wells v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.