Legal Opinion

McGee v. McDonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 2003No. Nos. 02-55715, 02-55861, 02-56449; D.C. No. CV-00-07964-TJHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Terrill McGee appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of McDonald’s Restaurants of California and Ralph’s Grocery Company, in his action alleging, among other things, that defendants violated 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (“RICO”) by participating in a scheme to physically disable McGee by serving him tainted fast food that would induce internal bleeding, and thereby interfere with the development and marketing of McGee’s patented eyewash helmet. McGee separately appealed 1 the district court’s denial of reconsideration, and rejection of McGee’s motion for sanctions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. MayoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Pedrina v. ChunCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. KerstingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Acura of Bellevue v. ReichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGee v. McDonald Restaurants of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API