Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Burgess

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1986No. Civ. 5083PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a divorce case.

The husband's motion for a new trial was filed on May 29, 1985. The trial court's order thereon dated August 29, 1985 was a nullity, since the husband's motion had been overruled by operation of Rule 59.1, A.R.Civ.P., as of August 27, 1985.Carnes v. Carnes, 365 So.2d 981 (Ala.Civ.App. 1978), cert.denied, 365 So.2d 985 (Ala. 1979). The husband had forty-two days after August 27, 1985, within which to appeal under Rule 4 (a)(1), (3), A.R.A.P. The last day that the husband could validly file his notice of appeal was on October 8, 1985, but it was not filed until October 9,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carnes v. CarnesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. State v. WallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Olson v. OlsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Haynes v. HaynesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Tri-State Auto Auction v. CrouchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sims v. SimsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. Wall v. WallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API