Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1984No. Nos. WD 35018-WD 35020PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

These three appeals arising from the same incident and, having a single disposi-tive issue, have been consolidated for opinion. Defendant Lechner was convicted in a bench trial. Defendants Heimburg and Hall were convicted in a joint trial before a jury-

The defendants assert that the state’s evidence fails to support the verdicts of guilt as it fails to prove the knowing possession by the defendants of the marijuana seized. The defendants’s claims must be sustained and the verdicts and judgments reversed.

The evidence in all three cases is virtually identical on the dispositive…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. The PEOPLE v. NettlesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. State v. PolkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. FunkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. GulleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API