Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Browder

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 30, 1996No. 07-96-0104-CVPublished

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

In their motion for rehearing, appellants cite Leder v. Stout, 278 S.W.2d 546 (Tex.Civ.App.—Amarillo 1954, writ ref'd) for the general rule that an unqualified agreement to perform a certain act includes the performance of those things which will enable or permit one to fulfill the obligation. Id. at 548. Appellants then contend the record demonstrates a means by which Mullan could have performed her promise. They argue that to make an effective transfer of the remaindermen’s interests, thereby fulfilling her obligation under the contract, Mullan should have “acquired…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Estes v. EstesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. West v. SeiglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Leder v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API