Legal Opinion

Noles-Frye Realty v. Dixon

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 2018No. 17–965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMY, Judge.

*604Following the failure of a purchase agreement, a realty company commenced this concursus proceeding so that the sellers and the purported buyer could advance their claims of ownership to the underlying deposit. Following a hearing, the trial court ruled in favor of the sellers after observing that, although the buyer was credible in her testimony regarding her inability to secure financing for the home, she failed to produce corroborating documentary or testimonial evidence in that regard. The buyer appeals. Following review, we reverse and render.

Factual and Procedural Background

No…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tracy Ray Lomont v. Michelle Myer-Bennett and Xyz Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  2. Woods v. AustinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. International Carriers, Inc. v. Pearl River Navigation, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Noles-Frye Realty (Nai Latter & Blum) v. Holly DixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API