Legal Opinion

Franke's, Incorporated v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 7, 1941No. 4-6126PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

Appellee brought this action against appellant to recover damages for injuries she sustained by reason of having eaten sea scallops in appellant’s cafeteria, which, she alleged were unwholesome and unfit for human consumption. She relied upon an implied warranty of fitness of the food and prayed damages in the sum of $3,000. The answer was a general denial. Trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for $3,000, from which comes this appeal.

The principal reliance of appellant for a reversal of the judgment is that there is no evidence that the scallops were unwholesome and unfit for consumption,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heinemann v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Lewis v. RoescherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sarti v. Salt Creek Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. United States Ex Rel. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. H. R. Henderson & Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  3. Hanrahan v. Walgreen CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Stewart v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. Minder v. Cielito Lindo RestaurantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API