Legal Opinion

Pennell v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 18, 1991PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

The appellant, Steven B. Pennell (“Pen-nell”), was indicted and tried on three counts of first degree murder. The State claimed that these were “serial” murders. Pennell was convicted on two of those counts, but the jury was unable to reach a verdict on the third count. The jury imposed two life sentences on the defendant.

Pennell claims that: (a) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial based upon remarks made by the prosecutor in her final summation to the jury; (b) the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence concerning the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. PressmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API