Legal Opinion
Aflac v. Baker
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 2021No. 20-1435Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
20-1435 Aflac v. Baker UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Ragone v. Atlantic Video at the Manhattan CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Graham Oil Co., an Oregon Corporation v. Arco Products Co., a Division of Atlantic Richfield Co., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.