Legal Opinion
Pellino v. Brink's, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 7, 2011No. 65077-7-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
¶1 In this class action lawsuit against Brink’s Incorporated, messengers and drivers of armored trucks allege they did not receive meal periods or rest breaks in violation of the Washington industrial welfare act (IWA), chapter 49.12 RCW, and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296-126-092. Brink’s appeals the judgment entered in favor of the class members and the trial court’s “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.” Brink’s asserts the trial court (1) abused its discretion in certifying the class action, (2) erred in interpreting the legal requirements for meal periods and rest…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lacey Nursing Center, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1995
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Augustus v. ABM Security ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Lopez Demetrio v. Sakuma Bros. FarmsWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Pellino v. Brink's Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Hill v. Garda CL Nw., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
- Mukilteo Retirement Apartments, LLC v. Mukilteo Investors LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.