Legal Opinion

Unifund CCR Partners v. Olofson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 22, 2018No. Appeal No. 2018AP185Published

1Opinion of the Court

GUNDRUM, J.1

¶ 1 David R. Olofson appeals pro se from a judgment for garnishment. We affirm.

Background

¶ 2 In 2008, a $7,950.83 default judgment was entered against Olofson. On August 10, 2017, Unifund CCR Partners attempted to collect on the judgment by filing a non-earnings garnishment action. Naming Olofson as the debtor and DD&P Services LLC, a business of which Olofson is part owner, as the garnishee, Unifund sought recovery of Olofson's property that was in DD&P's possession or control. On August 20, 2017, the garnishment action was served on Olofson and DD&P. The next day, August 21,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  2. Waushara County v. GrafWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Industrial Risk Insurers & Quad Graphics, Inc. v. American Engineering Testing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  4. State v. Van CampWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hefty v. StrickhouserWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API