Legal Opinion

French v. New York Mercantile Exchange

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 1903Published

■Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Walter G. French against the New York Mercantile Exchange. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtLaughlin, J.

This is a suit in equity to have an amendment to one of the by-laws of the defendant declared null and void, and to enjoin the defendant from taking any action pursuant to the provisions thereof. The preliminary steps required-previous to bringing the amendment to a vote at a meeting of the stockholders were duly taken and had, and it was duly adopted by the necessary vote at a meeting of the stockholders duly convened for that purpose on the 28th day of December, 1900. The only question presented is whether the corporation had power to enact the amendment. At the time of the adoption of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Consider Parish v. New York Produce ExchangeNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Parish v. New York Produce ExchangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Parish v. New York Produce ExchangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API