Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Euclid-Pine Investment Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
* Corpus Juris-Cyc References: Workmen's Compensation Acts, — CJ, section 54, n. 65, n. 13. This is an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, affirming an award made by the Workmen's Compensation Commission. The claim was filed by Mattie L. and James H. Jackson, as the dependents of their son, James Jackson, seventeen years of age, who was killed on December 6, 1927, while in the employ of Euclid-Pine Investment Company. The commission awarded the sum of $150 for funeral expenses, and to each of the claimants the sum of $5 a week for two hundred weeks for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Holland-St. Louis Sugar Co. v. ShralukaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Larson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Northwestern Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Toole v. Bechtel CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Murdoch v. Humes SwanstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Riggs v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Metting v. Lehr Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.