Legal Opinion

Giallanza Realty, Inc. v. Rosebud Properties, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1993No. A93A0242PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Giallanza Realty, Inc. (Broker) brought this action to recover real estate commissions, alleging both contractual and tort theories of liability. Named as defendants were Rosebud Properties, Inc. (RPI) and the Browns (Buyers). Service of process was never effected personally upon Don Hairston, Sr., the president and sole shareholder of RPI. The case was tried before the court without a jury and the broker appeals from a judgment entered in favor of all defendants.

1. The buyers were never contractually liable for any real estate commission and the record is devoid of evidence that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brack v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Meyers v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Parrish v. Ragsdale Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Carroll v. Harry Norman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Prestige Realty Co. v. CM & W Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krogh v. PARGAR, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Cannon v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Pacific Grove Holding, LLC v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API