Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Florida Bar v. Arango

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 25, 1984No. 62075Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBoyd, Chief Justice

I concur in the approval of the finding that Mr. Arango has engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. I dissent, however, to the punishment imposed by the Court. It will be recalled that Ms. Furman was given a clear opportunity to mend her ways before this Court finally, in desperation, chose to punish her open contempt of Court with a jail sentence. See The Florida Bar v. Furman, 451 So.2d 808 (Fla.1984); The Florida Bar v. Furman, 376 So.2d 378 (Fla.1979), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1061, 100 S.Ct. 1001, 62 L.Ed.2d 744 (1980). When finally ordered jailed, she had contemptuously and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. FurmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. The Florida Bar v. FurmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API