Legal Opinion

Rothstein v. Vinciquerra

Syracuse City Court

Decided August 4, 1966Published

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph F. Falco, J.

This is an action to recover rents under the terms of a written lease. The original action was commenced *147by the service of a summons and complaint on April 18, 1966 and was for the recovery of rents for the months of March and April, 1966. At the trial on June 22, 1966 the plaintiffs moved to amend the complaint to include the months of May and June, 1966 which they contend are now due and owing. Said motion to amend was granted.

At the close of all of the evidence defendants’ counsel moves to strike out the amendment to the complaint. This motion is hereby denied.

The facts in the case are as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nimmo v. HarwayAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  2. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Southern Tier Theatre Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Messer v. SmithAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925
  4. Enn-Jay Realty Corp. v. Allied Instrument Corp.New York City Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API