Legal Opinion

Maas v. McEntegart

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by James J. Fitzgerald, claimant of fund, from affirmance by the General Term of the City Court of an order made at Special Term conffiming, report of referee and directing distribution.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

Prior to June 11, 1896, one William H. Hay recovered a judgment against the defendant Christopher Sullivan. On that day Sullivan had on deposit to his credit in the West Side Bank $542.60, and'the bank was by a third party order in supplementary proceedings in aid of execution issued on the Hay judgment restrained from paying out said money, and the officers of the bank were required to submit to an examination under said proceedings on June 15th.

On .June 16th James J. Fitzgerald received from Sullivan a paper signed by the latter which reads: “ Received from James J. Fitzgerald, check of P.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. TillotsonNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Frear v. . SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Baird v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Teller v. RandallNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Krone v. KlotzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bayview General Hospital v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of PhillipsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1901
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Novartis Pharma AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  4. CT Espresso LLC v. Lavazza Premium Coffees Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  5. Gomprecht v. ScottAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API