Robinson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The principal issue raised in this appeal is whether under the circumstances of this case the trial court’s imposition of separate sentences for each of appellant’s three convictions offends the Double Jeopardy Clause. We find that appellant was properly convicted and sentenced on all charges and, accordingly, affirm his convictions and the sentences imposed by the trial court.
I
On February 27, 1978, as the complainant walked to a bus stop near her home in Hyattsville, Maryland, she was forcibly grabbed and thrown into a car by a man, later identified as appellant, Julius C. Robinson, Jr.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. McLaughlin, RicoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Catlett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Hanna v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.