Legal Opinion

Rentschler v. Fox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1902No. Docket No. 86PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Trespass quare clausum fregit by John E. Rentschler against David W. Pox. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of trespass. The declaration contains two counts, — one for breaking and entering the dwelling house of plaintiff, the other .for breaking and entering a store building occupied by plaintiff. The defendant j ustified his breaking by a plea setting up that he entered the two buildings in question while acting as a constable in the city of Detroit, and for the purpose of serving a writ of replevin.

*499The testimony offered by defendant tended to show that he visited the plaintiff at his store on Third avenue, and said to him that he had a writ of replevin for his shop fixtures and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howe v. OyerNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall v. WheelerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  2. State v. PopeWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API