Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crenshaw v. Alabama Freight, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 6, 1971No. 6 Div. 581Published

1DissentHeflin, Chief Justice

I disagree with Justice Coleman’s opinion that Plea II is a plea in bar. I feel that it is a plea in abatement.

*383Plea II is as follows:

“Plaintiff ought not to recover of this defendant for that:
“The accident made the basis of this action occurred February 23, 1965. Long prior thereto plaintiff deserted his family and his desertion continued until the death of said minor child as averred in said count.”

Justice Coleman in his proposed opinion states as follows:

“Plea II in the instant case is a complete defense to the action. The plea does not in any respect give plaintiff a better writ. If the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Blount v. Sixteenth St. Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Mitchell v. Church of ChristSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Gibson v. ShullSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API