Legal Opinion

Dion v. Ravenel, Eiserhardt Associates

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 6, 1994No. 2223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

The master, after granting foreclosure on certain highland property in Charleston County, amended his order pursuant to a motion by the respondents, hereinafter Dions, under Rule 60(a), SCRCP to include in the description of the property a causeway providing access to the highland property across the surrounding marsh. Ravenel, Eliserhardt Associates, Charles E. Eiserhardt, Jr., and Charles D. Ravenel, hereinafter Ravenel, and Patrick O’Connor appeal.1 We reverse and remand.

The Dions sold the highland property in question, along with surrounding marshland and a right of way, to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Michel v. MichelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Collins Entertainment Corp. v. Columbia "20" Truck Stop, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Ex Parte South Carolina Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Collins Entertainment Corp. v. Columbia "20" Truck Stop, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. McClure v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API