Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Sutton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1991No. 58226PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in an action by plaintiff, the ex-wife of defendant, to collect reimbursement for payment of hospitalization and related doctor bills incurred when the parties’ son was hospitalized.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sutton v. SchwartzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Sutton v. SchwartzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API