Legal Opinion

Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 17, 2003No. 3D03-453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

870 So.2d 127 (2003)

MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

Clara FLORES, Appellee.

No. 3D03-453.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 17, 2003.

Rehearing Denied April 16, 2004.

Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards & O'Connor and Warren B. Kwavnick, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Lopez & Best and Virginia M. Best, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.

2Per curiam

We affirm the judgment finding that the alleged error, if any, in the admission of the evidence was entirely harmless. See Soler v. Kukula, 297 So.2d 600, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Hall v. Haldane,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Soler v. KukulaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Hall v. HaldaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mercury Cas. Co. v. FloresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Burgess Transportation, Inc. v. ArosteguiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API