In re Nadler

*176OPINION OF THE COURT

In this proceeding, the respondent was charged with four allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained all four charges. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee.

The four charges are based on the following factual allegations:

1. The respondent, while an associate of the law firm of Balsamo and Rosenblatt, represented Ruthie Friedman in a landlord-tenant matter.

2. The respondent failed to timely commence proceedings on Ms. Friedman’s behalf.

3. In or about 1994, the respondent provided to her client a "stipulation…