Wooten v. Curry
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion
*556On Petition to Rehear
Defendants have filed a petition to rehear and additional authorities have been cited by both parties.
As in their original brief, defendants again rely strongly on Dr. Wood’s testimony that there are two schools of thought as to whether it is best to examine the patient and run the risk of infection. His testimony on that subject was not developed to show how long such examination should be postponed according to the school of thought favoring delayed examination. His testimony, however, shows that all danger of infection had passed at the end of nine days when Mrs.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Quinley v. CockeTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Fink v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Stickleman v. SynhorstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Casenburg v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.