Legal Opinion

McGee v. Fitzer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before the Hon. J. W. Oliver. There is no occasion for a statement of the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

We are of the opinion that the charge of the court, instructing the jury that the instrument claimed by appellant to be a mortgage, “is not, nor was it a lien on the cot- “ ton,” is erroneous. It is true, that the mortgage is not in full compliance with the statute, hut it substantially follows the statute in most of its material requisitions, and at least it may be held to be a good common law mortgage. It was a mortgage, subject, however, to the prior lien of the appellant; for St. Clair, the appellant’s own witness, proves that at the time of the execution of the mortgage to him, he…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Silberberg v. TrillingTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cook v. Steel, Furrh & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Abernethy v. UhlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Beard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  5. Fourmentin v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API