Legal Opinion

Central State Bank of Jackson v. Harrington

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 6, 1925No. 4150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDONAHUFj, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The answer purporting to be the answer of the T. H. & A. Coal Company, Blanche Harrington, and Arthur G. Adams, filed by these two partners, is not the answer of the partnership. The partnership property and business was then in the custody and control of a receiver. The authority of these two partners to control its affairs, either as partners or agents of the partnership, or their nonconsenting partner, ended when the receiver was appointed, and the property taken over and the business conducted by him. The answer, therefore, must be taken as the answer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Canute Steamship Co. v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Syracuse Engineering Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. Klein v. Nu-Way Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Moore v. LinahanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. In Re Elmsford Country ClubDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  5. Wood v. Natural Soda Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API