Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Justus v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1998No. 96-2745PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

One issue is presented: Did the commission abuse its discretion in denying claimant’s application for wage-loss compensation? Upon review, we find that it did not.

Former R.C. 4123.68(W) read at the time relevant herein:

“Cardiovascular, pulmonary, or respiratory diseases incurred by fire fighters or police officers following exposure to heat, smoke, toxic gases, chemical fumes and other toxic substances: Any cardiovascular, pulmonary, or respiratory disease of a fire fighter or police officer caused or induced by the cumulative effect of exposure to heat, the inhalation of smoke, toxic gases,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lewis v. Diamond Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Buckeye International, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Justus v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Sowers v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Miller v. ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Sowers v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API