United States v. Jongewaard
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
Larry Jongewaard was convicted of transmitting in interstate commerce a communication containing a threat to injure the person of another in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c). Jongewaard appeals, arguing that his conviction cannot stand because the Government failed to allege or prove that the relevant interstate communications were made to effect some change or achieve some goal through intimidation. Alternatively, Jongewaard contends that two evidentiary rulings by the district court 1 deprived him of a fair trial. For the following reasons, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- John Doe, a Minor, by His Mother and Next Friend, Jane Doe v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ronald D. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. MabieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Daron Lee JungersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Adrian StockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Brian GravesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.