Legal Opinion

Lambros v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 2003No. B158405PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

This case concerns the application of Insurance Code section 481 to appellant Vasillos S. Lambros’s life insurance policy, issued by respondent Metropolitan Life Insurance Company(MetLife). That statute provides that “(a) Unless the insurance contract otherwise provides, a person insured is entitled to a return of premium if the policy is canceled, rejected, surrendered, or rescinded, as follows: ... (2) Where the insurance is made for a definite period of time and the insured surrenders his policy, to such proportion of the premium as corresponds with the unexpired…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. LarsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  4. Jensen v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Vargas v. ATHENA ASSURANCE CO.California Court of Appeal · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
  2. Lambros v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API