Legal Opinion
Scanlan v. Lai
High Court of American Samoa
Decided March 24, 2000No. CA No. 17-99Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff Herbert J. Scanlan (“Scanlan”) initiated this suit on March 12, 1999, alleging that defendant Michael Lai (“Lai”) breached the lease for a certain commercial building in Fagatogo, American Samoa. Scanlan requested relief in the form of specific performance and damages for lost rent and other consequential losses. Lai answered on March 19, 1999. Trial took place on January 20, 2000, with both parties and their counsel present.
Facts
Scanlan and Lai entered into a lease agreement on February 1, 1995, for the commercial building at issue. The lease specified the term as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Dairy Queen Corporation v. Brown-Port Company, a Wisconsin Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Robinson v. PetersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Tempe Corporate Office Building v. Arizona Funding Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Marco Kona Warehouse v. Sharmilo, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.