Legal Opinion

United States v. Loussac

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided February 9, 1923No. 320-APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RITCHIE, District Judge.

Three questions have been considered as raising valid objections to ants on this bail bond. The first is that, although the defendant Gates was absent at the date set for his trial he was represented by his attorney. The Code of Alaska provides that a defendant may be tried upon a misdemeanor charge in his absence, if he is represented by counsel. This gives rise to two questions: Is it discretionary with the justice in such a case tc proceed in the absence of the defendant ? And, if so, can he do so if demand for trial is not made by attorney for defendant ? Several…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Malheur County v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State ex rel. Gleim v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. WelshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zula Swanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API