Martell v. Atlanta Biltmore Hotel Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
The contract sued on contains on its face all the essentials of a valid, binding, bilateral contract required by Code § 20-107. As against the general demurrer, the capacity of the parties to contract is presumed, as is their assent to the terms of the contract by their execution thereof. The subject matter is the stipulated services of the plaintiff and the consideration is the specified salary plus other agreed-on benefits.
There is nothing in the provisions of Paragraph 10 of the contract which is so vague or indefinite as to render the contract unenforceable for lack of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commercial Mortgage & Finance Corp. v. Greenwich Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Slater v. Savannah Sugar Refining Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Scott v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Butler v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grove v. Sugar Hill Investment Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Atlanta Biltmore Hotel Corp. v. MartellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Circle Appliance Leasing, Inc. v. Appliance Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- O. H. Carter Co. v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- In Re National Energy & Gas Transmission, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.