Legal Opinion

In re Rubinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The respondent was admitted to practice by this Court on December 23, 1964.

*263In this proceeding, the respondent was served with a petition containing one charge of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained the charge. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee in full. The respondent cross-moves to disaffirm any finding of professional misconduct, notwithstanding his adjudication of summary criminal contempt and the Court’s rule denominating such conviction a "serious crime,” and dismissing the proceedings in their entirety.

The…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re GiampaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re LeedsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. In re WerlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API