Legal Opinion
Joseph Murphy v. Curtis Bailey, et al.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided September 2, 2026No. 1:22-cv-01266Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION JOSEPH MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:22-cv-01266-JEH-RLH CURTIS BAILEY, et al., Defendants. Order This case is now before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) (Doc. 158) and Defendants’ Motion for Bill of Costs (Doc. 157). For the reasons stated below, the Motions are DENIED. I Plaintiff Andreya Montrise1 filed a Second Amended Complaint under
42 U.S.C. § 1983
alleging Defendants Travis Peters, Thomas Dayton, Ivan Perez, Curtis Bailey, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Sally Naeem v. McKesson Drug Company and Dan MontreuilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Alex F. Beamon v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Samsung America, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation, Samsung Shipbuilding & Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Formerly Known as Samsung Shipbuilding and Heavy Industries Company, Limited, a Republic of Korea Corporation, Samsung America, Incorporated, and Samsung Construction Equipment Company, a Division of Samsung America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Emily Rivera v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.