Legal Opinion

Samarzevosky v. Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 20, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Baltimore City sustaining demurrer to the declaration.

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

This suit was brought on the 19th of November, 1897, by Appolonia Samarzevosky, a married woman, by her husband and next friend, Felix Samarzevosky, against the Baltimore City Passenger Railway Company to recover for alleged personal injuries sustained by her. The declaration was demurred to upon the ground that a suit for personal injuries to a married woman must be brought by the wife and husband jointly, and this in*480volves a construction of the Act of 1892, ch. 267, relating to married women.

The Act of 1898, chapter 457, which repeals and reenacts Article 45 of the Code, title “Husband and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booze v. HumbirdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  2. Wolf v. BauereisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  3. Treusch v. Kamke ex rel. KamkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jordan v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  2. Hertz v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API